🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to resume atomic negotiations with Washington as long as it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi said exclusively dialogue produced results, and shared new appeals had come from intermediaries to restart discussions with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Navigating a Difficult Path

Araghchi is walking a complex route since Iran does not want be seen to be acting from a stance of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen more resilient in military terms and mentally from the joint assault on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Earlier Discussions Suddenly Terminated

The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that ended with the American leader declaring the sites had been obliterated. Following this, EU nations exercised their right to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the talks that US nuclear scientists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Representatives claimed repeatedly they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy the US official only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Current Situation

Tehran representatives stated the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be revived in various formats if talks reopen.

Trump last week claimed he had been getting signals that Iran sought to resume discussions, but in private Iran's diplomats say they are not yet getting clear proposals from Washington either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of non-responsiveness in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says diplomacy is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his remarks to the conference, designed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the notion of international law, the foreign minister said the two-week conflict revealed the dispute could not be settled by armed force. He said the attacks began with a US demand for an total Iran submission and culminated with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with complete American awareness and coordination, making faith challenging to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Ultimate Answer

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned diplomacy; it was America and the Western nations that had consistently attempted to dictate their will during the discussions. Negotiations can still be active and remains the ultimate solution to address disagreements, but its criteria, guidelines and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they talk to the Iranian people with the language of dignity and honor, they will receive a response in the equivalent approach."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the battle of repair and recovery, the foreign minister stated he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We gained numerous insights from this war; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He continued: "We managed to survive this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to destroy, continues to exist. The installations and equipment, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is important is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but did not succeed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have become more resilient, more cohesive, and more supportive of the government and the nation in the wake of this invasion."